Electromagnetic radiation transformation for power transports

ABSTRACT

Electromagnetic radiation transformation for power transports is described. In embodiment(s), a power conducting system can include a power transport such as a conduit or power line that conducts power which is a source of electromagnetic radiation. The power conducting system can also include a paramagnetic material in a quantity sufficient to counteract the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the source. In an embodiment, the power transport can be convered by an insulation cover that includes the paramagnetic material. To counteract harmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation, the paramagnetic material can transfrom the electromagnetic radiation, such as to effectuate a frequency transformation and/or to alter an intensity of the electromagnetic radiation.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser.No. 60/820205 filed Jul. 24, 2006 entitled “EMF Radiation Neutralizer”to Dandurand, the disclosure of which is incorporated by referenceherein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Electromagnetic radiation can include any form of electromagneticfrequencies (e.g., radio frequencies), electromagnetic interference orfields, and/or electro-pollution all which may be commonly referred toas “EMF” or “EMF radiation”. Electromagnetic radiation may originatefrom a variety of sources, including devices that are encountered duringtypical everyday life, such as wireless phones, music players, microwaveovens, computer devices, and so on. Consequently, exposure by a typicalperson to EMF radiation continues to increase as the prevalence of thesedevices also continues to increase. For example, it was not long agothat wireless phones (e.g., cellular phones) were rarely encountered.However, the use of wireless phones has become so pervasive that manyusers even forgo traditional wired phones in their homes for theconvenience of wireless phones, even by children.

The continued and ever increasing exposure to EMF radiation may havedetrimental effects to users that are exposed to EMF radiation emittedfrom devices and/or to those that simply encounter EMF radiation duringa typical day. Electromagnetic radiation in the form of x-rays,ultraviolet, and microwaves, as well as other portions of theelectromagnetic spectrum such as radio-frequency waves emitted fromcellular phones, computers, televisions, and other devices are known todamage the human body. For instance, it has been identified herein thatEMF radiation may cause damage to Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA), and thathuman DNA reacts adversely to incoherent manmade electromagnetic fieldsemanating from a cellular phone.

Additionally, as the understanding of EMF radiation and the detrimentaleffects continues to develop, it is quite possible that a variety ofother detrimental effects from exposure to EMF radiation may also befound. Further, this damage may be exacerbated depending on how the EMFradiation is encountered. For example, use of a wireless phone heldagainst the ear may increase EMF radiation and damage sensitive areas ofthe brain. A variety of other instances may also be encountered.

Research has been focused on the health hazards of cell phones due totheir endemic use. Some of the studies that measure the biologicaleffects of actual, broad spectrum cell phone radiation (not isolated orsimulated components) show detrimental effects. Reports that have beenasserted to counter these studies are asserted by some to be biased inexperimental design to favor conditions that are expected to result inno radiation effects. For example, it was asserted most studies usesingle isolated frequencies claimed to be emitted from cell phones.However, these individual frequencies are not representative of thebroader spectrum of frequencies actually emitted by cell phones. Inaddition, the questionable experiments often use low radiation doses,referred to as specific absorption rates (SAR). These studies that aredesigned to result in no biological damage use EMF radiation doses aslow as 0.08 W/kg, whereas experiments designed to show biological damagewould use EMF radiation doses as high as 100 W/kg.

As previously observed with video display monitors, the biologicaleffects of electromagnetic radiation are ascertainable when resonanceconditions are met. It is now well established that many confoundingvariables (e.g., the strength and orientation of the geomagnetic field)can create experimental conditions where biological effects are notobserved. Thus, studies that fail to measure biological effects fromcell phone radiation or from other sources of EMF may not have obtainedthe resonance conditions which when met cause these effects. Therefore,it has been suggested that the focus on studies which show no effectsand conclude that cell phone radiation is safe depart from the fact thatin real-life, cell phone users are exposed to this radiation numeroustimes during the course of a day and over the course of several years.Most scientific studies do not take into account the chronic use of cellphones.

In some cases the bimolecular sensors that resonate with harmfulradiation is known. Unfortunately, the most fundamental molecule in thebody, DNA itself, can act as a target for such radiation even when it isnon-ionizing and low-level. Studies have concluded that radio-frequencyEMF from cell phones, at intensities similar to those emitted fromcontemporary cell phones, directly damage DNA. This is the same type ofdamage that was previously established from exposure to UV and X-rays.Previous research with other types of EMF, not necessarily emitted bycell phones, indicated shape (conformation) changes in DNA. Strands ofDNA break or conformational changes in the DNA can result in theformation of damaged proteins in a body.

As devices and other sources that emit EMF radiation become increasinglyprevalent in our everyday lives, so too does the likelihood of exposureby users of the devices and others that simply encounter harmful EMFradiation. Indeed, in current times it may be difficult if not nearlyimpossible for users to avoid this exposure, such as through use of amicrowave, interaction with a personal computer, viewing of atraditional television, listening to a portable music player, using of ahandheld video game, and so on.

SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce simplified concepts ofelectromagnetic radiation transformation for power transports. Thesimplified concepts are further described below in the DetailedDescription. This summary is not intended to identify essential featuresof the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended for use in determiningthe scope of the claimed subject matter.

In embodiment(s) of electromagnetic radiation transformation for powertransports, a power conducting system can include a power transport suchas a conduit, power line, or electrical cord that conducts power whichis a source of electromagnetic radiation. The power conducting systemcan also include a paramagnetic material in a quantity sufficient tocounteract the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the source. In anembodiment, the power transport can be covered by a coating and/or aninsulation cover that includes the paramagnetic material. To counteractharmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation, the paramagneticmaterial can transform the electromagnetic radiation, such as toeffectuate a frequency transformation and/or to alter an intensity orwaveform of the electromagnetic radiation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of electromagnetic radiation transformation are describedwith reference to the following drawings. The same numbers are usedthroughout the drawings to reference like features and components:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example environment in which embodiments ofelectromagnetic radiation transformation can be implemented.

FIG. 2 illustrates example procedure(s) for electromagnetic radiationtransformation in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 3 illustrates example procedure(s) for electromagnetic radiationtransformation in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of an initial DNA rewinding curve.

FIG. 5 illustrates a spectrum of measured frequencies radiating from acell phone to illustrate an embodiment of electromagnetic radiationtransformation utilizing paramagnetic material.

FIG. 6 illustrates detected cell phone signals over background noise toillustrate an embodiment of electromagnetic radiation transformationutilizing paramagnetic material.

FIG. 7 illustrates detected cell phone signals to illustrate anembodiment of electromagnetic radiation transformation utilizingparamagnetic material.

FIG. 8 illustrates measured frequencies radiating from a cell phone toillustrate an embodiment of electromagnetic radiation transformationutilizing paramagnetic material.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of an initial DNA renaturation curve.

FIG. 10 illustrates the effect of a cell phone containing shieldingtechnology (e.g., paramagnetic material) on DNA renaturation.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example of paramagnetic material implemented forthe transformation of electromagnetic radiation emitted from a device.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of a device that emits electromagneticradiation having paramagnetic material implemented for thetransformation of the electromagnetic radiation.

FIG. 13 illustrates example procedure(s) for electromagnetic radiationtransformation for powered devices in accordance with one or moreembodiments.

FIG. 14 illustrates examples of paramagnetic material implemented fortherapeutic techniques into wearable items for electromagnetic radiationtransformation.

FIG. 15 illustrates example procedure(s) for therapeutic techniques withparamagnetic material in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 16 illustrates example procedure(s) for therapeutic techniques withparamagnetic material in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 17 illustrates examples of paramagnetic material implemented forcosmetic applications to counteract electromagnetic radiation.

FIG. 18 illustrates example procedure(s) for cosmetic composition withparamagnetic material in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 19 illustrates example procedure(s) for cosmetic composition withparamagnetic material in accordance with one or more embodiments.

FIG. 20 illustrates examples of paramagnetic material implemented tocounteract electromagnetic radiation emitted from power transports.

FIG. 21 illustrates example procedure(s) for electromagnetic radiationtransformation for power transports in accordance with one or moreembodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Overview

Electromagnetic radiation may originate from a variety of sources,including devices that are encountered during typical everyday life,such as wireless phones, music players, microwave ovens, computerdevices, and so on. Consequently, exposure by a typical person to EMFradiation continues to increase as the prevalence of these devices alsocontinues to increase. The understanding of the consequences to exposureto EMF radiation, however, continues to develop. For example, studieshave shown that analysis of the harmful effects of a single frequency ona biological organism may be inconclusive when compared to cumulativeeffects of multiple frequencies and different intensities on theorganism. A variety of other examples are also available as furtherdetailed below.

Accordingly, techniques are described herein that may be used tocounteract the possible harmful effects of EMF radiation as well asprovide other benefits, such as to provide protection against heavymetals. One or more such techniques involve the use of paramagneticmaterials which are substances having a magnetic susceptibility greaterthan zero (e.g., substances that are drawn into a magnetic field). Forexample, paramagnetism may be used to describe a tendency of atomicmagnetic dipoles, due to quantum-mechanical spin as well as electronorbital angular momentum, to align with an external magnetic field.Paramagnetic materials attract and repel like normal magnets whensubject to a magnetic field. This alignment of the atomic dipoles withthe magnetic field tends to strengthen it, and is described by arelative magnetic permeability greater than unity or, equivalently, arelatively small positive magnetic susceptibility. For example, certainiron bearing minerals may exhibit paramagnetism which causes them to beweakly attracted to magnetic fields.

Diamagnetism is a form of magnetism that is exhibited by a substance inthe presence of an externally applied magnetic field. It is the resultof changes in the orbital motion of electrons. All materials show adiamagnetic response in an applied magnetic field; however for materialswhich show some other form of magnetism (such as ferromagnetism orparamagnetism), the diamagnetism is completely overpowered. Substanceswhich only, or mostly, display diamagnetic behavior are termeddiamagnetic materials, or diamagnets. Materials that are said to bediamagnetic are those which are usually considered by non-physicists as“non-magnetic”, and include water, DNA, most organic compounds such aspetroleum and some plastics, and many metals such as mercury, gold, andbismuth.

Many common materials such as water, wood, plants, animals, diamonds,fingers, and so on are usually considered to be non-magnetic but infact, they are very weakly diamagnetic. Diamagnets repel, and arerepelled by a strong magnetic field. The electrons in a diamagneticmaterial rearrange their orbits slightly creating small persistentcurrents which oppose the external magnetic field. Two of the strongestdiamagnetic materials are graphite and bismuth. Even paramagneticcompounds (having unpaired electrons) will also have a smaller,diamagnetic contribution to their magnetism if there are electron pairspresent.

Accordingly, embodiments of electromagnetic radiation transformationincludes devices, systems, and/or procedures that may utilizeparamagnetic and/or diamagnetic techniques to transform electromagneticfrequencies (e.g., radio frequencies), electromagnetic interference orfields, and/or electro-pollution all which may be commonly referred toas electromagnetic radiation, “EMF”, or “EMF radiation”. An example ofsuch a material which has paramagnetic properties (one of which iselectromagnetic radiation transformation) is known as an “AulterraRock”, “Aulterra Powder”, or “Aulterra Neutralizer”. To counteractharmful effects of electromagnetic radiation, the paramagnetic materialcan transform electromagnetic radiation, such as to effectuate afrequency transformation and/or to alter an intensity or waveform of theelectromagnetic radiation.

Although “Aulterra Rock”, “Aulterra Powder”, and/or “AulterraNeutralizer” are given as examples in the following discussion, itshould be readily apparent that this discussion is not limited to the“Aulterra Rock”, “Aulterra Powder”, or “Aulterra Neutralizer” as othersubstances having similar properties are also contemplated. In variousembodiments, the paramagnetic material referred to herein typically hasa paramagnetic intensity or value of approximately 400 and above whichcan be embodied to effectuate electromagnetic radiation transformation.Any one or combination of the “Aulterra Rock”, “Aulterra Powder”, and/or“Aulterra Neutralizer”, however, typically resonates with an approximateparamagnetic value of 3,000 and above, and in various embodiments, theparamagnetic material referred to herein has a paramagnetic value in arange between 3,000 and 6,000.

Paramagnetic material may be used in a variety of ways to effectuateelectromagnetic radiation transformation. For example, the paramagneticmaterial may be provided in a quantity sufficient to counteractelectromagnetic radiation emitted by a device, such as a cell phone,music player, microwave oven, and so on. Counteraction ofelectromagnetic radiation may be performed in a variety of ways, such asthrough emission of an electromagnetic field, altering of a waveform,and so on, further discussion of which may be found in relation to FIGS.1-3 and the studies described below.

In one or more additional embodiments, techniques for electromagneticradiation transformation can be implemented for powered devices, such ascell phones. For example, a wireless phone, such as a cordless phone,cellular phone, or other similar device includes one or more sourcesthat emit electromagnetic radiation, such as an internal power supply orantenna system. The wireless phone can also include paramagneticmaterial in a quantity sufficient to counteract the electromagneticradiation emitted by the source(s). To counteract harmful effects of theelectromagnetic radiation, the paramagnetic material can transform theelectromagnetic radiation, such as to effectuate a frequencytransformation and/or to alter an intensity or waveform of theelectromagnetic radiation.

In one or more additional embodiments, techniques for electromagneticradiation transformation can be implemented for therapeutic techniqueswith paramagnetic material. For example, devices such as jewelry,pillows, soil additives, labels, containers and so on may incorporateparamagnetic material to effect a therapeutic result. In an example of awine, for instance, a label or container for the wine has been shown toincrease a shelf life of the wine when it includes a quantity ofparamagnetic material. A variety of other examples are alsocontemplated, such as protection against heavy metal toxicity, exposureto electromagnetic fields, and so on, further discussion of which may befound in relation to the following figures.

In one or more additional embodiments, techniques for electromagneticradiation transformation can be implemented for cosmetic composition(s)with paramagnetic material. For example, cosmetics may be configured toimplement the therapeutic techniques described above to a wearer of thecosmetic, such as to protect a user against outside influences as wellas promote therapeutic response from inside influences, furtherdiscussion of which may be found in relation to the correspondingsection.

In one or more additional embodiments, techniques for electromagneticradiation transformation can be implemented for power transports. Forexample, a power conducting system can include a power transport such asa conduit, power line, electrical cord, and the like that conducts powerwhich is a source of electromagnetic radiation. The power conductingsystem can also include a paramagnetic material in a quantity sufficientto counteract the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the source. In anembodiment, the power transport can be covered by a coating and/or aninsulation cover that includes the paramagnetic material. To counteractharmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation, the paramagneticmaterial can transform the electromagnetic radiation, such as toeffectuate a frequency transformation and/or to alter an intensity orwaveform of the electromagnetic radiation.

In the following discussion, a general description of electromagneticradiation transformation techniques is first provided along with studiesthat support these techniques. Exemplary embodiments are then describedof electromagnetic radiation transformation techniques. Although theseexemplary embodiments are provided as examples of electromagneticradiation transformation techniques, it should be readily apparent thatthe techniques may be employed in a variety of other ways. For example,the paramagnetic techniques may also be employed to reduce harmfuleffects of heavy metals and for other therapeutic purposes.

While features and concepts of the described systems and procedures forelectromagnetic radiation transformation can be implemented in anynumber of different environments and/or systems, embodiments andtechniques of electromagnetic radiation transformation are described inthe context of the following example systems and environments.

Electromagnetic Radiation Transformation

FIG. 1 depicts an example environment 100 in which various embodimentsof paramagnetic techniques can be employed. The environment 100 is shownwith a quantity of paramagnetic material 102 that may be configured fora variety of uses and effects. For example, the paramagnetic material102 may be configured for use with a device 104 to transformelectromagnetic radiation emitted by the device 104, which isillustrated as an EMF source 106 in FIG. 1. The device 104 may assume awide variety of configurations, such as a cell phone 108, microwave oven110, music player 112 and “other” devices, such as power conduits 114,personal 116 and laptop 118 computers, a television 120, and so on asdepicted in FIG. 1. In this example the paramagnetic material 102 isconfigured to transform electromagnetic radiation that is emitted “from”the device 104.

The paramagnetic material 102 may also be configured to protect anentity 122 from “outside” electromagnetic influences that emitelectromagnetic radiation. For example, the paramagnetic material 102may be configured to protect cell phone 108, microwave 110, music player112 and “other” devices from electromagnetic radiation emitted fromother devices. A personal computer (PC), for instance, may be installedin a “noisy” environment having a relatively high amount ofelectromagnetic radiation that adversely affects operation of thepersonal computer. By providing the personal computer with theparamagnetic material 102, however, the personal computer may experiencenormal operation through transformation of the electromagnetic radiationby the paramagnetic material.

The paramagnetic material 102 may also be employed to protect a varietyof other entities 122 that are not devices, such as a person 124 (i.e.,a human being), a perishable product (e.g., wine 126 or other liquids128), a pet 130 (e.g., dog, cat, bird, and so on) or other biologicalentity, and other entities. Mechanisms that may be employed to providethis transformation to internal and/or external electromagneticradiation are further described below.

In the following studies, one technique that has been asserted is aphenomenon in biological systems referred to as macroscopic quantumcoherence. This mechanism includes an assertion that the energyradiating from paramagnetic material 102 may be highly coherent (e.g.,laser-like) which may be activated during manufacture of theparamagnetic material 102 to make the intrinsic energy of theparamagnetic material 102 coherent. The paramagnetic material 102 mayalso have intrinsic quantum properties similar to other complex latticestructures which also exhibit quantum properties.

Another technique that has been proposed in a study discussed below is a“bio-protective effect” which reduces the intensity of offendingelectromagnetic radiation. At least two different mechanisms may beemployed for such a technique, such as a biochemical defense responseand a physical alteration of encountered electromagnetic radiation.

A further technique involves a magneto resistance response (e.g.,Meissner effect), which is induced when the paramagnetic material 102 isin the presence of magnetic fields. Thus, paramagnetic shielding (inaddition to ferromagnetic shielding) is one explanation for the abilityof the paramagnetic material 102 to reverse effects of cell phoneradiation, such as on DNA renaturation. Ferromagnetic transduction hasbeen previously proposed to mediate biological effects ofelectromagnetic radiation (e.g., from cell phones) because of theirresonance with the biological mineral magnetite. Furthermore, the factthat the Meissner effect is dependent on magnetic field orientation canalso explain off-resonance conditions and why individual experiments arenot reproducible in each case, but are reproducible as a whole.

Yet another technique involves emission by the paramagnetic material 102of an electromagnetic field that counteracts electromagnetic fieldsencountered within that field. This observation provides anothermechanism to explain how the paramagnetic material 102 may canceldetrimental effects of electromagnetic radiation, since it is known thatadding coherent information to a classical EMF modifies its ability toinfluence biological systems. For example, the paramagnetic material mayboth generate magnetic fields (due to the presence of unpairedelectrons) and absorb magnetic fields (a property called magneticsusceptibility). Thus, it is likely that the paramagnetic material 102also generates a classical EMF which can couple to and counteractanother electromagnetic field, such as to neutralize harmful effects tothe “other” electromagnetic field. Electromagnetic field emission by theparamagnetic material 102 may also be used to explain the effect of theparamagnetic material to counteract detrimental effects of heavy metalson biological specimens (e.g., DNA). Further discussion of thesetechniques may be found in relation to the studies which follow thesubsequent exemplary procedures. A variety of other techniques are alsocontemplated, such as by altering a waveform of electromagneticradiation encountered by the paramagnetic material 102.

FIG. 2 depicts example procedure(s) 200 of electromagnetic radiationtransformation, and describes techniques that may be implementedutilizing the previously described environment, or any other environmentand/or system described herein. The procedure is shown as a set ofblocks and described in an order that is not intended to be construed asa limitation. Any number of the described blocks can be combined in anyorder to implement the procedure, or an alternate procedure. In thisexample, reference is made to environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.

Procedure 200 illustrates an example implementation in which a device ismanufactured that has an amount of paramagnetic material which iscalculated to counteract electromagnetic radiation to be encountered ata particular setting. An amount of paramagnetic material is calculatedto counteract electromagnetic radiation to be encountered at aparticular setting (block 202). For example, a magnetometer may be usedto measure the overall intensity of electromagnetic radiation across oneor more desired ranges of frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum.Differing amounts of paramagnetic material may then be disposed withinan effective range of the emitting devices (in this instance the cellphone) and measurements may then be made using the magnetometer. Thisprocess may be repeated until a desired effect is encountered, which inthis instance is a decrease in intensity of the electromagneticradiation for particular frequencies (e.g., ranges of frequencies)emitted by the emitting device (e.g., the cell phone), such as adecrease of thirty-five (35) percent, fifty (50) percent, seventy (70)percent, and so on. In addition to a decrease in intensity ofelectromagnetic radiation, a variety of other effects are alsocontemplated, such as to reduce harmful effects of heavy metals, effectof EMF on DNA, and so forth.

A device is then manufactured having the calculated amount of theparamagnetic material (block 204). For example, the device may beconfigured as a disk that is to be disposed within or on the cell phoneof the previous example. The device that includes the paramagneticmaterial may also assume a variety of other configurations, such as acoating (e.g., paint), jewelry, a cosmetic, a product label orcontainer, and so on, further discussion of which may be found inrelation to the following sections.

FIG. 3 depicts example procedure(s) 300 of electromagnetic radiationtransformation, and describes techniques that may be implementedutilizing the previously described environment, or any other environmentand/or system described herein. The procedure is shown as a set ofblocks and described in an order that is not intended to be construed asa limitation. Any number of the described blocks can be combined in anyorder to implement the procedure, or an alternate procedure. In thisexample, reference is made to environment 100 shown in FIG. 1.

Procedure 300 illustrates an example implementation in which harmfuleffects of electromagnetic radiation are reduced by altering a waveformof the electromagnetic radiation using a paramagnetic material.Electromagnetic radiation is encountered that is emitted at a particularsetting (block 302). For example, a cell phone may emit electromagneticradiation from an internal antenna or power source, a human being mayemit electromagnetic radiation, a wine bottle may encounterelectromagnetic radiation in a storage setting, and so on.

A waveform of electromagnetic radiation is altered using a paramagneticmaterial such that one or more harmful effects of the encounteredelectromagnetic radiation are measurably reduced (block 304). Thewaveform of electromagnetic radiation may be altered, for example, suchthat an incoherent waveform is transformed into a coherent waveformthrough interaction with the paramagnetic material. The reduction in theharmful effects may be measurably reduced in a variety of ways, such asby examination of DNA rewinding, intensity of electromagnetic radiationat particular frequencies known or suspected to cause harmful effects,and so on. Further discussion of measurement and reduction of harmfuleffects may be found in relation to the following studies.

Conformational Changes in Human DNA Characterize the Radiated Energyfrom the Aulterra Formulation

Information content associated with both classical and non-classical(subtle, non-Hertzian, scalar) electromagnetic energy can be stored inphysical objects. These objects include water, geometric patterns,electronic circuits, and even paper. For water and electronic circuits,preliminary evidence suggests that the stored information can besubsequently retrieved or utilized by biological systems, therebyproducing a biological effect. In this sense these objects have a memoryof the information stored within them. Although longtime storage ofinformation in physical objects is considered an anomaly in the eyes oftraditional science, it has been demonstrated experimentally.

Research by Glen Rein, Ph.D. in this area has demonstrated that subtleenergy generated from “free energy” devices and those associated withhuman intention can be stored in water for several months if the opticalproperties of water are measured using a special form of ultraviolet(UV) spectroscopy. Furthermore, the stored energy is biologically activewhen the water is exposed to a variety of biological systems. One of thebiological targets used in these studies was the DNA molecule. Inaddition to these responses to stored or imprinted energy, DNA has beenshown to act as an antenna for other forms of subtle energy. Thus, ithas been discovered that in addition to classical EM fields, subtleenergy resonates with the DNA molecule and may cause physical changes inits secondary structure (e.g., winding and unwinding of the helix).

DNA Exposed to the Energy of Aulterra Powder

The recovery curve is a typical curve when DNA is suspended in water andleft to spontaneously rewind. When the DNA was placed on the AulterraPowder for one day and then measured, there was no change in therecovery curve. However, after 3, 4, or 5 days of exposure to the energyfrom the powder, a rather interesting recovery curve is obtained.

Instead of a smooth and gradual rewinding process, the recovery curve isoscillatory in nature. This means that the DNA rewinds, then unwinds alittle, then continues to rewind and continues to go through cycles ofwinding and unwinding. This oscillatory behavior has been observed inother systems. It is interesting to note that in the case of experimentsperformed by others, it was proposed that the observed oscillatorybehavior of water in those experiments was induced by human intentionassociated with healing states of consciousness. Healing states ofconsciousness have a proposed association with coherent oscillatory EEGpatterns. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the energy from healerscould affect conformation of DNA when the electrical activity of theirEEG exhibited such oscillatory behavior. Thus, by inference the energyemitted from the Aulterra Powder may be similar to the energiesassociated with healers.

Neutralizing the Effects of Heavy Metal Toxicity

Copper (Cu(II)) was chosen as a representative heavy metal because thebiological action of copper is mediated by binding to DNA and causing itto unwind. A series of experiments were performed to determine theappropriate concentration of copper, i.e., a high enough concentrationthat would produce a measurable effect on DNA but not too high as tototally overload the system. It was predicted that the ability of theenergy from Aulterra's Powder to neutralize the toxic effect of copperwould be minimized at higher concentrations of copper. Based on theliterature, a concentration of 1 mM was initially tested. In order todetermine the effect of copper, the slope of the recovery curves wasanalyzed first in the absence of any heavy metals. The normal recoveryrate was determined in six separate experiments with the average valuefor the slope of −0.813: f: 0.06. The recovery rate was then measured infour separate experiments when DNA was exposed to 1 mM copper for 2days. The average slope was dramatically reduced to 0.023: f: 0.015.

Preliminary experiments were conducted to determine whether this largeeffect of copper on DNA recovery rates could be neutralized if the DNAwas placed on top of the Aulterra powder while being exposed to thecopper. After two days, the average slope was −0.011, which is not muchdifferent than −0.023 (both giving around 98% inhibition) indicatingthat the energy from the Aulterra powder did not neutralize the damagingeffect of the copper. However, after three days the slope was −0.28 (66%inhibition) and after four days the slope was −0.36 (55% inhibition),rapidly approaching the −0.81 values for the slope in the absence ofcopper. These results demonstrate that the energy from the Aulterrapowder does in fact counteract, and in this instance partiallyneutralize the toxic effect of copper by reducing the 97% inhibition(with no energy) to 55% in the presence of the powder. The effectappears to be linear with time indicating that the longer the DNA wasexposed to the energy, the larger the neutralizing ability. The resultswere encouraging, but revealed partial protection from copper when usedat 1 mM concentrations.

It is possible that only partial protection occurred because theconcentration of the toxin was too high. Therefore, these experimentswere repeated with a lower dose of copper, 0.5 mM. Based on the previousexperiments, it was predicted that a neutralizing effect of the lowconcentration of copper would be seen after only two days. Therefore,twelve separate experiments were done with DNA exposed to 0.5 mM copperin the presence and absence of energy from Aulterra's Powder. See Table1 which includes the raw data from six (6) separate experiments showingR2 slope values for slope calculated by computer. In this case thecopper alone caused an 86% inhibition of DNA recovery, giving an averageslope value of −0.11: 1 0.25. In the presence of the energy from theAulterra Powder, this effect was reduced to only 36%, giving an averageslope of −0.52: 1 0.18. The raw data from each of the twelve (12)separate experiments is shown in Table 1. Statistical comparison of thelast two numbers reveals a highly significant difference (p=0.01). Theseresults, taken together with the previous results using higherconcentrations of copper (Table 2), clearly demonstrate the ability ofthe energy from Aulterra's powder to neutralize the toxic effect ofcopper. Table 2 indicates an effect of the energy from Aulterra's Powderto prevent Cu induced damage to DNA. TABLE 1 Experiment Off PowderExperiment On Powder 1 −0.219 7 −0.566 2 −0.499 8 −0.401 3 −0.02 9−0.224 4 +0.127 10 −0.525 5 −0.206 11 −0.710 6 +0.166 12 −0.662 Average−0.109 Average −0.516 Standard 0.25 Standard 0.18 Deviation Deviation

TABLE 2 Average Slope % Inhibition Std No Cu, no energy (control) −0.8130.06 1.0 mM Cu, no energy −0.023 97 0.015 1.0 mM Cu with Aulterra's−0.011 98 — energy 05. mM Cu, no energy −0.11 86 0.25 0.5 mM Cu withAulterra's −0.52 36 0.18 energy

The Effect of Aulterra 's Homeopathic Preparation on DNA

Control water used to make the homeopathic preparation showed similar tothat previously observed with deionized water. Preliminary experimentsindicated that, depending on the experiment, several different types ofresponses were observed in DNA exposed to the homeopathic preparation.Sometimes the recovery would initially appear normal (e.g., a steadydecrease) but after approximately twenty (20) minutes the DNA would stoprewinding and begin to slowly unwind (positive slope). In other cases itwould stop rewinding and remain stationary, i.e., the DNA didn'tcontinue to wind or unwind (e.g., flat slope). In other casesoscillatory behavior was observed very similar to that observed when theDNA was placed on the powder. This oscillatory behavior may be acharacteristic response of DNA to Aulterra's energy, whether it beradiating from a powder or “read” by the DNA from information inimprinted water. The non-reproducibility of the phenomenon in regards tothe homeopathic preparation is likely due to resonant conditions thathave not yet been found experimentally. It is predicted that under thecorrect resonance conditions, the oscillatory behavior will be morereproducible.

The Ability of Aulterra's Neutralizer to Reverse Harmful Effects ofElectromagnetic Fields Generated from Cell Phones on Human DNA

Electromagnetic (EM) fields from cell phones were shown to have astatistically significant detrimental effect on the recovery of humanDNA after heat shock. Work by Glen Rein, Ph. D. indicated that thiseffect was observed with cell phones on standby mode when they areemitting relatively weak EM fields and after only minutes of EM fieldexposure. The detrimental effect of EM energy from cell phones wascounteracted, and in this instance completely neutralized, whenAulterra's Neutralizer (e.g., paramagnetic material) was attached to theback of the cell phone. In the presence of the Neutralizer, there was100% recovery of the DNA as if no cell phone was present. Thisneutralizing effect appears to prevent initial damage to DNA immediatelyfollowing EM field exposure.

In the experimental approach, a biological system is influenced by EMfields from cell phones, which in this instance is purified human DNAsuspended in a natural ionic environment. Previous studies demonstratedthat the secondary structure of DNA is sensitive to classical andnon-classical EM fields, thereby indicating that energy fields caninfluence the winding and unwinding of the two strands which make up theDNA helix and define its conformation.

Because heat shock causes DNA strands to unwind, a sensitive assay wasdeveloped which involves measuring the kinetics of rewinding followingheat shock. As DNA cools, it gradually rewinds back into an intactdouble helix. The rewinding process can be monitored by measuring theabsorption of UV light as a function of the cooling temperature orincreasing time. As the DNA rewinds, hydrogen bonds reform to connectthe two strands. Thus the rate of DNA rewinding is directly related tothe number of hydrogen bonds formed.

Sodium chloride was added to the deionized water in these experiments tosimulate the natural ionic environment of DNA as it normally exists inthe human body. Iron was also added since a previous study demonstratedthat the sensitivity of DNA to UV light is enhanced in the presence ofsmall amounts of iron (ferric ions). Three types of experiments wereconducted in this study. The control experiments were done first in thepresence of ambient EM fields, but in the absence of man-made EM fields.In the electromagnetic experiments, DNA recovery was measured in thepresence of EM fields from cell phones. The third set of experimentsinvolved measuring DNA recovery in the presence of neutralized EM fieldsfrom cell phones containing the Neutralizer.

For the experimental methods, the specific protocol that was followedinvolved making a stock solution (0.4 mg/ml) of human placental DNA(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis) in deionized water. The stock solutionwas diluted to 0.03 mg/ml in 5 mM NaCl containing 1-4 μM FeCl. Aconcentration of 1 μM FeCl was shown to be optimal and used in the finalexperiments. Immediately after heat treatment (80° C. for four minutes)the DNA was transferred to a quartz cuvette and placed in a cuvetteholder inside a spectrophotometer. For EM field exposure, a mobile cellphone (popular in the late 1990's) was plugged in, set on standby modeand placed face up on top of the cuvette. The cell phone cord was fedthrough a hole in the side of the spectrophotometer so the lid could beclosed during measurement of DNA rewinding.

To neutralize the EM fields, the Aulterra Neutralizer was placed on theback of the cell phone directly below the antenna. The cell phonecontaining the Neutralizer was then placed face up on top of thecuvette. In these experiments, normal and neutralized cell phones wereidentically placed on the cuvette immediately after heat treatment andremained there for the duration of the experiment. The same protocol wasused for these two sets of experiments, as well as for controls, whichwere done in the absence of any cell phone. Controls were done first,followed by the cell phone treatment. Then two weeks time elapsed beforebeginning the neutralized cell phone experiments to dissipate the cellphone energy and avoid conditioning effects.

For each experiment, the conformation of DNA was measured with state ofthe art biochemical methodology using a UV-visible diode arrayspectrophotometer (Hewlett Packard 8451A) to quantify the amount of UVlight absorbed. Spectrophotometric measurements were taken every tenseconds for fifteen minutes and began immediately after the cell phoneswere placed on the cuvette and the lid closed. As the DNA rewinds, theabsorption of light gradually decreases. The initial slope of rewindingwas calculated using spreadsheet software.

FIG. 4 illustrates a typical initial rewinding curve 400. The line 402is a plot of the raw absorption data collected by the spectrophotometeras a function of time after heat shock. The line 404 is the computergenerated best-fit calculation of the slope. The slope in this regioncorresponds to the initial recovery rate, classically used bybiochemists in studying enzyme kinetics. The initial slope wascalculated for each separate experiment and then compared statisticallyusing a two sample t-test (assuming equal variance). For statisticalanalyses, a total of six control experiments, eight EM experiments, andsix neutralized EM experiments were used.

Electromagnetic Fields from Cell Phones Effect DNA Recovery

The results in Table 3 demonstrate the effect of EM fields from cellphones on DNA rewinding after heat shock. In the absence of EM fields(control experiments), a negative slope for DNA rewinding is obtained. Aless negative value for the slope reflects a slower rewinding rate.Therefore, in the absence of EM fields the average slope was−0.877±0.041. In the presence of EM fields from the cell phone the slopehad an average value of −0.687±0.189. This indicates that the EM fieldfrom the cell phone produced a 22% slow down in DNA rewinding. Thisdetrimental effect of EM fields from the cell phone is highlysignificant compared to the untreated control (p<0.02). TABLE 3 Avg.Slope SD n p (vrs. control) Control −0.877 0.041 6 Cell Phone −0.6870.189 8 0.02 Cell Phone + −0.872 0.063 6 not significant Neutralizer

Cell Phone Damage Reversed with the Aulterra Neutralizer

The cell phone containing the Neutralizer produced a similar effect onDNA rewinding as was observed in the controls. The average slope forthese experiments was −0.872±0.063. This result is not significantlydifferent than the control value indicating that the harmful effect ofthe EM field from the cell phone is completely neutralized by thepresence of the Neutralizer.

A previous study from the Quantum Biology Research Lab (Rein, 2000)demonstrated an unusual effect when a test tube containing human DNA inan aqueous solution was physically placed on top of the Aulterra Powder(e.g., paramagnetic material), the active ingredient of the Neutralizer.The results demonstrated that the powder radiates an energy field whichresonates with DNA producing an oscillatory winding and unwindingbehavior in its secondary structure. Such behavior is consistent withthe newly discovered phenomenon in biological systems referred to asmacroscopic quantum coherence and suggests that the energy radiatingfrom the Aulterra Powder is highly coherent (e.g., laser-like). Sincethe paramagnetic material in the powder will radiate classic(incoherent) EM energy, it is conceivable that the activation procedurein the manufacturing of the powder makes this intrinsic energy coherent.Alternatively, the unique mixture of minerals in the Aulterra Powder mayhave intrinsic quantum properties, like other complex lattice structureswhich also exhibit quantum properties.

The ability of Aulterra's Powder to radiate quantum fields is related toits ability to store quantum information following activation. Quantuminformation storage is now a recognized technology in the computerindustry which involves optical and magneto-optical storage. Informationstorage in computers and in Aulterra's products share a commonmechanism, since they both use an external EM field to store informationand both result in the emission of a different type of EM field. Somevariations of computer technology allow storage of information in threedimensional lattice structures, similar to Aulterra's mineral base. Inother variations of computer technology, the emitted EM field can be acoherent laser. Furthermore, certain storage media exhibit unusualanomalous behavior referred to as space-inversion symmetry (i.e., normalsymmetry associated with magnetization of the optical materials isbroken). A similar situation also exists in phase conjugating systemswhere a time-reversed longitudinal wave is emitted. According to quantumphysics, both of these situations occur at the quantum level and areassociated with the presence of quantum fields. Therefore, if theseestablished systems are capable of emitting a quantum field, Aulterra'stechnology may also do the same.

If the Aulterra Powder radiates a highly coherent field, how could sucha field neutralize the harmful, incoherent radiation emitted from a cellphone? Although traditional physics theory states that two force fieldsdon't interact in space (e.g., they pass through each other), recentexperiments indicate that such interactions are possible. Working withtwo incoherent light sources, a demonstration was made that one couldmodulate the action of the other to modulate a chemical reaction. Inaddition, another demonstration was made that energy associated with achemical enzyme inhibitor, in powder form, could produce a biologicaleffect when the molecular energy was used to modulate a laser. In thissense, the coherent laser energy acted as a carrier for the molecularenergy. These studies demonstrate that two energy fields can in factinteract. Furthermore, mixing incoherent and coherent energies can havedifferential effects on biological systems, since a critical ratio ofincoherent to coherent energy is required to observe biological effects.

These studies offer an explanation for the ability of a coherent fieldgenerated from the Aulterra Powder to neutralize the biological effectsof incoherent energy from a cell phone. These studies also explain theresults in the previous study by the Quantum Biology Research Lab.Coherent energy from the Aulterra Powder could therefore neutralize thedetrimental biological effect of the chemical energy associated withheavy metals. In these experiments, however, the biological system (DNA)was being influenced by both the energy from the chemical toxin and thechemical toxin itself. Nonetheless, the Aulterra Neutralizer offeredcomplete protection.

The Aulterra Neutralizer Reduced the Intensity of Cell Phone Radiation

There is now accumulating scientific evidence that cell phone radiationis harmful to the body. Some have suggested that these reports have beencountered with studies that are biased in their experimental design tofavor conditions expected to show little to no effects. For example,most of these studies use single isolated frequencies known to beemitted from cell phones. However, studying the biological effects ofisolated cell phone frequencies is a reductionist approach. From abiological point of view, the sensitivity of an organism to anindividual cell phone frequency is different than the broader completespectrum of frequencies actually emitted by cell phones. In addition,experiments are often done using low radiation doses, referred to asspecific absorption rates (SAR). Thus, experiments designed to showbiological damage use doses as high as 100 W/kg. Experiments designed toshow no damage use doses as low as 0.08 W/kg, a 1200 fold lower dose.

The fact that higher doses produce stronger damaging effects is thescientific rationale for using headsets which reduce the intensity ofthe radiation by physically placing the cell phone away from the brain.Unfortunately, this approach just shifts the problem to another part ofthe body, since these cell phone users typically wear their phones onthe belts, thereby exposing reproductive organs to harmful radiation. Itwas therefore of interest to determine whether the Aulterra Neutralizer(e.g., paramagnetic material) might reduce the intensity of cell phoneradiation.

The intensity of cell phone radiation is typically measured using aspecial type of magnetometer. Magnetometers measure the overallintensity of cell phone radiation across many frequencies comprising theelectromagnetic spectrum. In the experiments presented here, radiationemitted by a cell phone and a wireless 2.45 GHz phone was measured byplacing a cell phone antenna, tuned to the specific frequencies emittedby these devices, next to the unit while receiving an activetransmission. The signal detected by the antenna was then transferred toa spectrum analyzer.

A spectrum analyzer is a sophisticated magnetometer which can measurethe intensity of the cell phone radiation at each frequency across theentire broad spectrum emitted by the cell phone. It can also measure theintensity of the radiation at a specific frequency. Six separateanalyzer graphs of the intensity of the emitted radiation versusfrequency were recorded under each of the experimental conditionsdefined below. Representative graphs of the background and the signalwith and without the Neutralizer are presented here for each of theexperimental conditions. To allow direct comparison of graphs with andwithout the Neutralizer, these graphs have the same intensity scale(y-axis). In some experiments, particularly those with interferingsignals from nearby cell phones, the starting reference baseline valueswere different. In the third experiment, human voice patterns weregenerated by calling the local weather station which broadcast arecording of the human voice. The experimental conditions for each ofthe four experiments reported here are summarized below.

Results and Discussion, Experiment #1

FIG. 5 illustrates that a broad spectrum of frequencies 500 radiatingfrom the cell phone could be measured which were significantly abovebackground fluctuations. Large discrete peaks occurred at specificfrequencies, e.g., 54, 72, and 94 MHz. For example, a large peak 502 ismeasured from the cell phone operating without the addition ofparamagnetic material. In addition, smaller peaks occurred on eitherside of these main peaks, assumedly due to the information beingtransmitted over the open line. When the Neutralizer (e.g., paramagneticmaterial) was placed in the phone, the side peaks disappeared and themain peak 504 was reduced in size by half. This reduction in intensitywas observed qualitatively at each of the main peaks but was alsostudied quantitatively in detail using the 94 MHz peak. The experimentwas done six times with and without the Aulterra Neutralizer in the cellphone. The average intensity of the 94 MHz peak was 36.4±1.3 dBm. Withthe Aulterra Neutralizer, this peak decreased in size to a value of17.6±2.5 dBm. This 52% (2-fold) reduction is highly statisticallysignificant (p<0.0001).

Results and Discussion, Experiment #2

FIG. 6 illustrates experiments 600 in which the background was not flatand weak as in previous experiments, but contained several flattenedpeaks in the same region as previously observed, indicating the presenceof a nearby interfering cell phone in the immediate environment. Despitethe presence of this strong environmental noise (e.g., “background”),the cell phone signal could still be detected above the backgroundsignal. The efficacy of the Aulterra Neutralizer to reduce the cellphone radiation is shown in two different frequency regions 602, 604where the cell phone signal was at least twice that of the backgroundsignal.

Since in this experiment each box is 7 dBm high, the average backgroundvalue was 45 dBm. The cell phone signal 606, 608 showed strong peaksreaching a maximum value of 66 dBm. In the presence of the Neutralizer(e.g., paramagnetic material), the same cell phone produced signals withan intensity corresponding to 50 dBm. Subtracting the backgroundcontribution to the signal, the cell phone signal was 21 dBm and theneutralized (e.g., altered or transformed) cell phone signal 610, 612was 5 dBm. This corresponds to a 76% (4-fold) reduction of the signal inthe presence of the Neutralizer.

In this portion of the EM spectrum, it is clearly visible that the cellphone signal 610, 612 in the presence of the Aulterra Neutralizer isquantitatively and qualitatively similar to that obtained from thebackground. It is interesting to note that although the three peaksattributable to the cell phone are significantly reduced in the presenceof the Neutralizer, they can still be made out.

Results and Discussion, Experiment #3

FIG. 7 illustrates an experiment 700 that was designed to compare thecell phone signal 702 with an open line and the signal 704 when thehuman voice was being transmitted over the line. A high background wasobserved indicating the presence of an interfering cell phone. Themeasured signal 704 from a cell phone with voice patterns wassignificantly larger and more irregular (chaotic) than the signal 702with an open line. The voice signature is most apparent on the shoulderof the main cell phone peaks. In the presence of the Neutralizer (e.g.,paramagnetic material), the voice signature 706 was significantlyreduced in amplitude.

Results and Discussion, Experiment #4

FIG. 8 illustrates experiments 800 in which the background noise wasweak. The wireless phone (e.g., a cordless base-station phone) generateda peak 802 at 2.48 GHz with two smaller side peaks on either side of themain peak. This experiment was analyzed quantitatively using individualvalues from the six separate experiments. In the absence of the AulterraNeutralizer (e.g., paramagnetic material) the amplitude of this mainpeak 802 was 61.0±1.64 dBm. With the Aulterra Neutralizer the intensitywas reduced to 42.9±1.16 dBm at 804. This 30% reduction wasstatistically significant (p<0.0001). Thus, the Neutralizer is somewhatless effective at reducing this peak than the peaks obtained from a cellphone. This is expected since the total radiation emitted from a cellphone is distributed amongst several frequency bands which are lessintense than the strong peak obtained for the wireless phone. Aspreviously reported for the cell phone, both side peaks associated withinformation being transmitted were completely eliminated by theNeutralizer.

The results of these experiments indicate that the Aulterra Neutralizerweakens cell phone and wireless phone radiation by reducing theintensity of their signature frequency peaks. In all experiments, theAulterra Neutralizer was effective across the entire radio and microwavespectrum of radiation emitted by these devices. This inhibitory effectwas also independent of the various experimental conditions, i.e.,whether there were interfering cell phone signals in the immediateenvironment or whether there were human voices being transmitted overthe line. In some experimental conditions the neutralized phone hadradiation emissions similar to those of the background ambient noise.

This new data should be taken in conjunction with the previousobservation that the Neutralizer also reduces the damaging effects ofcell phone radiation as measured by changes in the conformation of humanDNA. This latter result indicates that the Neutralizer is protecting akey biological system from the detrimental effect of cell phoneradiation. The results from the present study suggest that thebio-protective effect of the Neutralizer is in part due to the reductionin the intensity of the offending radiation. The results of both studiestaken together indicate that the Neutralizer protects the body by twodifferent mechanisms, a biochemical defense response and a physicalalteration of the cell phone signal.

Mitigating the Biological Effects and Radiation Intensity of Cell Phones

Maria Syldona, Ph.D. has stated in an article that several studies havedemonstrated detrimental effects of cell phone radiation on biologicalsystems when resonance conditions are met and therefore submits thefollowing article. This article introduces a novel in-vitro method fordemonstrating conformational changes in human DNA induced by a fiveminute exposure to cell phone radiation emitted by an actualcontemporary cell phone. Dynamic changes in DNA conformation wereassessed in real-time by measuring the rate of renaturation followingheat shock. Cell phone radiation produced a 40% increase in the rate ofDNA renaturation. This effect was completely attenuated when theexperiment was repeated with the same cell phone containing acommercially available shielding technology. In a separate series ofexperiments the intensity of the cell phone radiation was measured usinga Spectrum Analyzer. The intensity was reduced by approximately 50% inthe presence of the shielding technology. Taken together, these studiesindicate a new method of mitigating the biological effects of cell phoneradiation.

While there is growing evidence that many types of electromagnetic (EM)energies such as those involved in bone healing, wound healing and painrelief have beneficial effects on the body, other types of EM field areharmful. For example, x-rays and ultraviolet light have been long knownto damage the body. Other portions of the EM spectrum are currentlybeing studied by the Bioelectromagnetics community of scientists whostudy electro-pollution and make recommendations to the governmentregarding public safety. Radio frequency and microwaves, as well aspower line frequencies which are emitted by modern household andcommunications devices, have been asserted to have detrimental effectson the body. These effects, however, can be somewhat elusive sincespecific experimental conditions are required for a resonanceinteraction between EM fields and their biological targets. Theseconditions are not always met in certain experimental designs.

More recently cell phones have become of interest. Several clinicalstudies have been published in peer-reviewed journals demonstratingdetrimental effects of cell phone radiation. Carcinogenic effects ofcell phone radiation are of particular concern since severalpeer-reviewed studies have demonstrated genetic damage. Epidemiologicalstudies have demonstrated a statistically significant associationbetween radio-frequency cell phone radiation and cancer with an increasein disease incidence with increasing exposure. Increased tumor incidencein animal studies as well as in-vitro studies corroborates the clinicalstudies. Direct effects on DNA offer a feasible mechanism of action asstudies have demonstrated cell phone radiation induces strand breaks.

The present study measured the effects of cell phone radiation on DNAconformation in-vitro and measured the intensity of the radiationemitted by cell phones. DNA conformation was measured using classicalrenaturation techniques. The intensity of cell phone radiation wasmeasured using a spectrum analyzer. The results demonstrate that cellphone radiation speeds up DNA renaturation and that this effect isprevented when a commercially available processed mineral is placed inthe presence of the cell phone radiation. A second series of experimentsdemonstrated that this same shielding device also reduced the intensityof radiation emitted from cell phones.

In the first series of experiments, conformational changes in human DNAwere measured in this study by monitoring renaturation in real-time. Theprocedure involved measuring the recovery of DNA after heat shock knownto denature the two strands of the double-helix. After heating, the DNAquickly recovered by rewinding back to its original intact conformation.The rewinding process can be monitored by measuring the absorption oflight by chromophores in the DNA strands. Control experiments wereconducted first in the presence of ambient EM fields. Then DNA rewindingwas measured in the presence of the cell phone. In the thirdexperimental condition, DNA rewinding was measured using the same cellphone containing an Aulterra Neutralizer (e.g., paramagnetic material)placed on the battery inside the cell phone. A second series ofexperiments was conducted to determine the efficacy of the AulterraNeutralizer in reducing the radiation emitted by a cell phone. Theintensity of the emitted radiation was measured using a spectrumanalyzer.

DNA Rewinding Assay (Series I)

To determine the effect of cell phone radiation on a model biologicalsystem, DNA renaturation was measured. A stock solution of humanplacental DNA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis) in deionized water wasfurther diluted to 0.03 mg/ml in deionized water and heat shocked forfour (4) minutes at 80° C. Immediately after heat treatment the DNA wastransferred to a quartz cuvette and immediately measured in aspectrophotometer with the lid closed. For EM field exposure, a cellphone (2004 model), in receiving-mode with no human voice transmitted,was placed face down on top of the cuvette inside the spectrophotometer.The cell phone remained in this position for the duration of the fiveminute experiment. The exact procedure was then repeated using the samecell phone containing the Aulterra Neutralizer.

Absorption of light at 260 nm was measured using a UV-visible diodearray spectrophotometer (Hewlett Packard 8451A) every ten seconds over afive minute time period. As the DNA rewinds, its ability to absorb lightdecreases with time. The initial slope of the rewinding curve, typicallyused when studying kinetics of biochemical reactions, was calculatedusing spreadsheet software. All rewinding curves had a negative slopevalue. Slope values for the different experimental conditions wereanalyzed for statistical significance using a two sample t-test(assuming equal variance). A total of twelve (12) control experiments,fourteen (14) cell phone experiments and twenty-two (22) neutralizedcell phone experiments were used for these analyses.

Measurement of Cell Phone Radiation (Series II)

This series of experiments was designed to test the ability of theAulterra Neutralizer to reduce the intensity of radiation emitted by acell phone. The radiation emitted by the same cell phone used in SeriesI was measured by placing a cell phone antennae on top of a cell phonewhile receiving an active transmission. Such antennae are tuned to thespecific frequencies emitted by cell phones. For some experiments thephone was receiving a repeating, pre-recorded weather channeltransmission. The signal detected by the antenna was then transferred toa spectrum analyzer (Agilent ESA-E series with FM modulation). Sixseparate analyzer graphs, plotting intensity of emitted radiation vs.frequency, were generated from the cell phone and six additional graphswere generated using the same phone containing an Aulterra Neutralizer.Representative graphs are presented here for each of the experimentalconditions. To allow direct comparison of graphs with and without theNeutralizer, these graphs have the same Db intensity scale (y-axis).

FIG. 9 shows a typical initial DNA renaturation curve 900 over severalminutes. The irregular line 902 is a plot of the raw absorption datacollected by the spectrophotometer. The line 904 is the computergenerated best-fit calculation of the slope.

Electromagnetic Fields from Cell Phones Effect DNA Renaturation

The results presented in Table 4 below indicate the effect of cell phoneradiation on DNA renaturation after heat shock. In the absence of cellphone radiation (control experiments), the average slope over all twelveexperiments was −0.41±0.065. In the presence of EM fields from the cellphone, the slope had an average value of −0.56±0.056 over all fourteenexperiments. A more negative value for the slope reflects a fasterrewinding rate following heat shock. Therefore, the EM field from thecell phone produced a 40% increase (relative to control values) in therewinding rate. The magnitude of the effect varied from 20-58% dependingon the experiment. This effect of the cell phone radiation is highlystatistically significant compared to the untreated control (p<0.0001).TABLE 4 Avg. Slope SD % change n p (wrt control) Control −0.41 0.065 12Cell Phone −0.559 0.056 +40 14 <0.0001 Cell Phone + −0.43 0.115 +5 22not significant Neutralizer

Aulterra Neutralizer Attenuates Cell Phone Induced Effects on DNA

The results in Table 4 indicate that the cell phone containing theNeutralizer produced an average slope of −0.43±0.11 for all 22experiments. This average value is not significantly different than thecontrol value indicating that the effect of the cell phone radiation onrenaturation is completely reversed in the presence of the Neutralizer.When examining the data 1000 from the individual experiments as shown inFIG. 10, however, it is apparent that on some occasions the cell phoneradiation is not neutralized (e.g., experiment numbers 2, 3, 4, 10, and13). This indicates that for these particular treatment sessions, on agiven day, resonance conditions were not met. FIG. 10 illustrates theeffect of a cell phone containing paramagnetic material on DNArenaturation, and includes the average slope values for each oftwenty-two (22) experiments.

Aulterra Neutralizer Reduces Cell Phone Radiation

Several discrete frequencies emitted from the cell phone could bemeasured with the spectrum analyzer, which were significantly abovebackground fluctuations. Large discrete peaks occurred at specificfrequencies, e.g., 54, 72, and 94 MHz. In the presence of the AulterraNeutralizer (e.g., “With Paramagnetic Material” as shown in FIG. 5) areduction in the intensity of all peaks was observed and the peak at 94MHz was studied quantitatively. Over six experiments, the averageintensity of the 94 MHz peak was 36.4±1.3 dBm. With the Neutralizer thispeak decreased in size to a value of 17.6±2.5 dBm. This 52% (2-fold)reduction is highly statistically significant (p<0.0001). Since the twosmaller side peaks were absent when measuring a signal from an openchannel with no human voice transmission, they are likely due to humanvoice modulation of the cell phone signal. In the presence of theNeutralizer, both side peaks were completely eliminated.

Experiments performed in Series I utilize a classical property of DNA,renaturation, as a new model system for studying in-vitro effects ofcell phone radiation. The results indicate that cell phone radiationsignificantly speeds up the rate of rewinding. This effect is highlyreproducible in the fourteen (14) independent experiments with amagnitude that varied between 20% and 58%. The effects observed on DNAconformational states in the present study suggest a particularresonance between cell phone radiation and hydrogen bonds which holdtogether the two strands of the DNA helix. Other similar types of EMfields have also been shown to effect DNA conformation. Hydrogen bondsalso maintain the secondary structure of other important bio-moleculeslike chromatin, whose conformation is also sensitive to the cell phoneradiation. If cell phone radiation is shown to have a direct effect onhydrogen bonds in general, the implications for biology could beprofound. This hypothesis is feasible because hydrogen bonds havevibrational modes in the microwave region where cell phones emit.

The ability of cell phone radiation to effect DNA conformation issupported by a hypothesis stating that DNA itself can act as a targetfor EM fields. Additional support comes from studies demonstrating thatcell phone radiation can directly break (nick) one or both DNA strands,whereas other types of EM fields alter DNA synthesis. Althoughconformational changes cannot be considered harmful, per se, other EMfield effects on DNA are clearly detrimental.

Typically, harmful effects have been studied using individualfrequencies known to be generated from cell phones and only few studiesuse actual cell phones which emit a complex mixture of individualfrequencies. DNA nicking (e.g., induced by cell phones) is known to beassociated with subsequent development of cancer. Since the implicationsfor public health are profound, methods to mitigate the harmful effectsof cell phone radiation are currently being sought. New technologieshave emerged utilizing a novel concept that one type of EM field canreverse or neutralize the biological effects produced by another type ofEM field. This has been demonstrated through an observation that asecond orthogonal light beam could interact with and neutralize thebiological effects induced by a first light beam. Similar results weredemonstrated with DC magnetic fields capable of neutralizing the effectof a pulsed magnetic field on neurite outgrowth in neuronal cells. Yetanother similar phenomenon was demonstrated using incoherent noisefields to neutralize magnetic field effects on ornithine decarboxylaseinduction. At least one example of how this technology can be applied tocell phone protection was recently demonstrated in a study using acommercially available shield. In this study the number of fruit flyoffspring was used as a model system and shown to be sensitive to cellphone radiation. This effect was reversed when a commercially availablealuminum shield was added to the cell phone

The present study demonstrates a similar phenomenon, but utilizes adifferent model system. Here the cell phone induced changes in DNArenaturation are completely reversed when an Aulterra Neutralizer (e.g.,paramagnetic material) is added to the cell phone. This effect is seen77% of the time yielding an overall statistically significant effect.The fact that this effect is not seen in every experiment is interestingand suggests that resonance conditions are not met in every experiment.So far resonance conditions have been characterized in terms of narrowfrequency and amplitude windows.

In the present case, resonant conditions involve a complex interactionbetween two EM fields and the DNA molecule. The second EM field,admittedly weak, is expected to be generated from the AulterraNeutralizer itself. In other similar systems (described above), wheretwo EM fields interact, the strength of and orientation between the twofields is critical in order to obtain resonance conditions.

In the present experiment, off-resonance conditions occur only 23% ofthe time. Experiments can be designed in such a way that off-resonanceconditions occur frequently enough to conclude cell phone radiationproduces no damaging effects. Many of the scientific studies reported inthe literature utilize such experimental designs. Redesigning suchexperiments can produce on-resonance conditions so that cell phoneeffects can be measured. In real-world situations consumers arechronically exposed to cell phone radiation which at times is either onor off-resonance.

Preliminary experiments indicate that the Aulterra Neutralizer containsa highly paramagnetic mineral. It is therefore conceivable that amagneto resistance response (Meissner effect) is induced when theNeutralizer is in the presence of the magnetic fields generated fromcell phones. Thus paramagnetic shielding (in addition to ferromagneticshielding) is a likely explanation for the ability of the Neutralizer toreverse the effects of cell phone radiation on DNA renaturation observedin this study. Ferromagnetic transduction has been previously proposedto mediate biological effects of cell phones because of their resonancewith the biological mineral magnetite. Furthermore, the fact that theMeissner effect is dependent on magnetic field orientation can alsoexplain off-resonance conditions and why these and other similarexperiments are not 100% reproducible.

The reversal of DNA renaturation effects observed in Series I of thepresent study is further supported by the results obtained by measuringcell phone radiation using a spectrum analyzer (Series II). Specificabsorption rates are typically used to quantify the intensity of cellphone radiation, which in turn is related to the severity of thebiological damage and therefore public safety. The results of thepresent study clearly indicate that the intensity of the radiationemitted from cell phones is reduced by approximately 50% in the presenceof the Aulterra Neutralizer. In all experiments, the Neutralizer waseffective across the entire radio and microwave spectrum of radiationemitted by these devices. This neutralizing effect was also independentof the various experimental conditions, i. e., the presence of voicepatterns or EM signals from nearby electronic devices.

When the spectrum analyzer data is taken in conjunction with the DNAdata, a strong case may be made for concluding that the AulterraNeutralizer is capable of protecting the body from cell phone radiation.Although the bio-protective effect may be a result of reducing theintensity of the cell phone radiation, it is also possible that a weakEM field generated by the Neutralizer could have a direct stabilizingeffect on the DNA. Therefore, the Aulterra Neutralizer appears toprotect the body by both a biological and a physical mechanism. This isthe first report of any commercially available cell phone shieldingdevice capable of such a dual action.

Although the cell phone induced changes in DNA conformation measured inthis study cannot be considered biologically detrimental, the resultssupport previous studies demonstrating that DNA does in fact directlyinteract with cell phone radiation. The in-vitro effect produced by suchradiation was completely reversed when the cell phone contained acommercially available shielding technology. This finding, when takentogether with experiments demonstrating that the shielding device alsoreduced the intensity of cell phone radiation, supports the conclusionthat the Aulterra Neutralizer mitigates the effects of cell phoneradiation on DNA in-vitro. It is presently unknown whether thisprotective effect extends to in-vivo conditions.

Cell Phone Radiation Induced Changes in Human DNA

As previously described, electromagnetic fields (EMF) in the form ofx-rays, ultraviolet, microwaves and so on may cause damage to the body.Other portions of the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum, including radiofrequency waves emitted from cell phones, computers, television andother devices may also be harmful to the body. Government fundedresearch by the Bioelectromagnetics community has now focused on thehealth hazards of cell phones due to their endemic use. Of the largenumber of studies, measured biological effects of actual, broad-spectrumcell phone radiation (not isolated or simulated components) show somedetrimental effects.

As previously observed by the Bioelectromagnetic community with videodisplay monitors, biological effects of such radiation are typicallyobserved when resonance conditions are met. It is now well establishedthat many confounding variables, e.g., the strength and orientation ofthe geomagnetic field, can create experimental conditions wherebiological effects are not observed. Thus, studies which failed tomeasure biological effects from cell phone radiation have may not haveexperienced the resonance conditions which cause the effect to beobserved. Therefore, although it is tempting for cell phonemanufacturers to focus on studies showing little to no effects andconclude that cell phone radiation is safe due to these observations innon-resonant conditions, real-life cell phone users may be exposed tothis radiation numerous times during the course of a day and over thecourse of several years. Further, most scientific studies do not takeinto account the chronic use of cell phones.

In some cases, bio-molecular sensors which resonate with the harmfulradiation are known. Unfortunately, the most fundamental molecule in thebody, DNA itself, can act as a target for such radiation even when it isnon-ionizing and at a relatively low-level. A recent study concludedthat radio-frequency EMF from cell phones, at intensities similar tothose emitted from contemporary cell phones, directly damage DNA. Thisis the same type of damage previously shown for UV and x-rays. Previousresearch with other types of EMF, not necessarily emitted by cellphones, indicated shape (conformation) changes in DNA. Either strandbreaks or conformational changes in DNA can result in the formation ofdamaged proteins in the body.

Therefore, there is a continuing need for technology that counteracts(e.g., blocks or neutralizes) cell phone radiation. Since the radiationemitted from cell phones is relatively strong, inert materials which canabsorb the radiation to significantly reduce the body's exposure may notbe readily available. An alternative approach is to use materials whichradiate EMF of their own to neutralize the cell phone radiation. Thereare several examples in the scientific literature where one type ofradiation will neutralize another, which is described in further detailbelow. The Aulterra Powder is an example of such a material which,because of its paramagnetic properties, radiates an EMF whichcounteracts (e.g., neutralizes) the damaging effects of cell phoneradiation on DNA.

A highly sensitive bioassay has been developed by the QBRL (QuantumBiology Research Laboratory) to quantify EMF effects by measuringconformational changes in human DNA. The procedure involves measuringthe rewinding of DNA after heat shock, which unwinds the two strandsthat make up the DNA double-helix. After heating, the DNA rewinds backto its original intact conformation. The rewinding process can bemonitored by measuring the absorption of light as the DNA cools.

The results of this study indicate that cell phone radiation speeds uprewinding of DNA after heat shock. This study replicates the results ofa previous study with the Aulterra Neutralizer. However, the previousstudy used an older cell phone technology no longer in use and was donewith a cell phone in “stand-by” mode. The present study used a cellphone popular around 2002 which was tested while in a “receiving” mode.

In the previous study, cell phone radiation slowed down DNA rewinding.These opposite effects could be due to the fact that different types ofcell phones (new vs. old technology) were used in the two studies andthey were used in different modes (stand-by mode vs. operating mode). Acell phone in operating mode will generate a stronger EMF. Otherscientific studies have observed that the direction of a biologicaleffect is dependent on the intensity of the applied EMF with oppositeeffects at high and low doses.

The sensitivity of DNA to EMF is also dependent on its ionicenvironment. In the previous study, DNA was surrounded by sodium andiron ions which are known to bind to DNA and influence its helicalstructure. Iron is ferromagnetic and influences the susceptibility ofDNA to EMF. Furthermore, the iron and possibly even the sodium ionsthemselves could absorb EM radiation and complicate the interpretationof the results, since these ions are known to mediate biological effectsof EM fields. The interaction of different ions with DNA and the cellphone radiation is complex and could account for the opposite effectsobserved in the two studies.

The results of the present study confirm those of the previous studythereby demonstrating that cell phone induced changes in DNA arecompletely reversed when an Aulterra Neutralizer (e.g., paramagneticmaterial) is added to the cell phone. In the present study, the cellphone effect on DNA was twice as strong as before (40% vs. 22%) and theNeutralizer still showed 100% protection. In some experiments not onlydid the elevated slope values return to normal, but they went belowcontrol values. This indicates that in approximately one-fifth of theexperiments, the neutralized CP radiation actually slowed DNA rewinding.It is therefore predicted that when these resonance conditions are met,the neutralized CP radiation could actually have a beneficial effect onthe body.

It was previously observed that the EMF generated from the AulterraPowder induces an oscillatory winding and unwinding behavior in DNA.Since rewinding of DNA strands involves the formation of hydrogen bonds,which exhibit quantum properties, it was proposed that the AulterraPowder radiates a quantum field which is highly coherent (e.g.,laser-like). This observation was offered as a feasible mechanism toexplain how the Aulterra Neutralizer could cancel the detrimentaleffects of cell phone radiation, since it is known that adding coherentinformation to a classical EMF modifies its ability to influencebiological systems.

Additional scientific literature indicates that other mechanisms arealso likely to explain the results of the present study. These studiesdo not require that the EMF radiating from the Aulterra Powder becoherent, but rather indicate that even classical EMF emissions canproduce the same neutralizing effects. Paramagnetic substances like theAulterra Powder can both generate magnetic fields (due to the presenceof unpaired electrons) and can absorb magnetic fields (a property calledmagnetic susceptibility).

Thus, it is likely that the Aulterra Powder also generates a classicalEMF which can couple to and neutralize the EMF from the cell phone.Although classical EMF theory does not predict that two interacting EMFcan influence each other, scientific evidence indicates that thebiological activity of one EMF can be altered in the presence of asecond EMF. For example, an interaction between two perpendicular,high-frequency EMFs in air which annihilated the effect of the primaryEMF on the crystalline lattice structure of an enzyme substrate has beenobserved. More recent experiments combine low frequency EMF with staticmagnetic fields.

These experiments indicate a complex interaction between the two fieldswhere the biological activity of the low frequency EMF can either beenhanced or reduced depending on the orientation and the amplitude ofthe two fields. In some orientations and amplitudes, no modulation ofthe biological activity is observed. Therefore, interaction between thetwo fields may occur under certain resonance conditions and not others.In the present study there is also a complex interaction between the EMFradiating from the cell phone, the energy radiating from the Neutralizer(e.g., paramagnetic material), and the geomagnetic field. Althoughreported resonance occurs under certain correct conditions, in thepresent study, the cell phone radiation was still completely neutralizedby the energy radiating from the Neutralizer.

Electromagnetic Radiation Transformation for Powered Devices

Embodiments of electromagnetic radiation transformation for powereddevices can include devices, systems, and/or procedures that may utilizeparamagnetic and/or diamagnetic techniques to transform electromagneticfrequencies (e.g., radio frequencies), electromagnetic interference orfields, and/or electro-pollution all which may be commonly referred toas electromagnetic radiation, “EMF”, or “EMF radiation”.

In various embodiments, a wireless phone, such as a cordless phone,cellular phone, or other similar device includes one or more sourcesthat emit electromagnetic radiation, such as an internal power supply orantenna system. The wireless phone can also include paramagneticmaterial in a quantity sufficient to counteract the electromagneticradiation emitted by the source(s). To counteract harmful effects of theelectromagnetic radiation, the paramagnetic material can transform theelectromagnetic radiation, such as to effectuate a frequencytransformation and/or to alter an intensity or waveform of theelectromagnetic radiation.

In another embodiment, a casing that supports the components of awireless phone can include the paramagnetic material which counteractsthe electromagnetic radiation emitted by the components of the wirelessphone. Alternatively, the paramagnetic material can be formed in adisk-shaped, layered product that includes an outer layer, one or morelayers of the paramagnetic material, and an adhesive layer that adheresto the wireless phone.

FIG. 11 illustrates an example 1100 of paramagnetic material implementedfor the transformation of electromagnetic radiation emitted from adevice, such as a wireless phone, cellular phone, computer device, orany other similar type of device that may emit electromagneticradiation. In this example, a disk-shaped, layered product(“paramagnetic disk”) 1102 includes paramagnetic material 1104. Anyother shape or design of an apparatus that includes paramagneticmaterial is contemplated.

The paramagnetic disk 1102 in this example is implemented with variouslayers of different materials. An outer layer 1106 (e.g., a first side,top layer, or top section) is a product apex that can be implemented toinclude a holographic image or other marketing identifier 1108. Theparamagnetic disk 1102 can also include any number of layers 1110(1-N)that are each a layer of paramagnetic material (e.g., activated rareearth elements). In an embodiment, the paramagnetic disk 1102 includesthree (3) layers of the paramagnetic material 1104. In alternateembodiments, any number of layers of the paramagnetic material can beutilized to increase, decrease, alter, and/or transform the effects ofelectromagnetic radiation from an electronic or computing-based device,such as a cell phone for example. In addition, the layers ofparamagnetic material 1110(1-N) can each include a base material 1112 tosupport the paramagnetic material 1104. In various embodiments, the basematerial 1112 can be an ink-based material, a silica-based material, orother type of material that supports mixing with the paramagneticmaterial.

The paramagnetic disk 1102 also includes a bonding agent 1112 that bondsthe layers of paramagnetic material 1110(1-N) between the outer layer1106 and an adhesive layer 1114. The adhesive layer 114 (e.g., a secondside, bottom layer, or bottom section) can be implemented as a pressuresensitive backing material that can be used to adhere the paramagneticdisk 1102 to a device that emits electromagnetic radiation.

FIG. 12 illustrates a cellular phone 1200 in which an example of theparamagnetic disk 1102 is installed within the housing 1202 of the cellphone 1200 when the battery and/or back plate 1204 of the cell phone isremoved. Because cell phones often have quite a rough existence as aportable item, implementing the paramagnetic disk 1102 as a flat,adhesive product is practical and effective. This embodiment providesthat the paramagnetic disk 1102 can be positioned inside of the cellphone 1200 against the inner housing 1202 with the battery removed toprotect it from damage. As such, the battery can then be removed and/orreplaced while the paramagnetic disk 1102 remains in position.Additionally, the flat, adhesive paramagnetic disk 1102 combines a largesurface area with a minimum of interference in the handling and usage ofthe cell phone 1200.

The cell phone 1200 is merely illustrative of the various devices 1206that may include a power source 1208, an antenna assembly 1210, or anyother type of electromagnetic radiation source 1212. The paramagneticdisk 1102 in cell phone 1200 provides the paramagnetic material in aquantity sufficient to counteract the electromagnetic radiation emittedby any one or combination of the sources. In an alternate embodiment,the housing 1202 of the cell phone 1200 is a casing that supports thecomponents of the cell phone, and may be formed to include theparamagnetic material. Other types of devices 1206 that can beimplemented to include paramagnetic material in a casing of the device,or with a paramagnetic apparatus such as the paramagnetic disk 1102, area wireless phone, a microwave, a music player, a portable computingdevice, a desktop computer, a television, and other devices as shownand/or described with reference to FIG. 1.

In an embodiment, the paramagnetic material 1104 (also shown asparamagnetic material 102 described with reference to FIG. 1) can bemanufactured and/or packaged as a powder blend that has an approximateparamagnetic value over 400 to change the EMF waveform emitted from anelectronic or computing-based device, and/or to create a biologicalresponse to protect against EMF radiation. The paramagnetic materialdoes not block or absorb EMF radiation from a device in as much as itretunes the EMF frequencies, counteracts harmful effects of theelectromagnetic radiation, transforms the electromagnetic radiation,and/or neutralizes the electromagnetic radiation.

In various embodiments, the paramagnetic material can transform theelectromagnetic radiation to effectuate a desired frequency range of theelectromagnetic radiation. The paramagnetic material may also transformthe electromagnetic radiation to decrease an intensity of one or morefrequencies of the electromagnetic radiation. The paramagnetic materialmay also counteract the electromagnetic radiation to effectuate aparamagnetic frequency transformation and/or a diamagnetic frequencytransformation. Alternatively, and/or in addition, the paramagneticmaterial can also be implemented to emit an electromagnetic field tocounteract the harmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation.

In an embodiment, the paramagnetic material retunes the EMF frequenciesof electronic devices like cell phones and computers to assimilatenatural frequencies so that they no longer cause harm to a human body'sDNA. The homeopathically enhanced and/or crystalline matrix of theneutralizing material can be mixed with an ink base (or with any otherbase-type material) to support the finely ground minerals and traceelements of the neutralizing material. Other base-type materials thatmay be used to mix with the neutralizing material include silica,silicon, and/or a caulking type material.

Experiments have shown that human DNA reacts adversely to incoherentmanmade electromagnetic fields emanating from a cell phone whilerecovering from heat shock. Measurements of the time that it takes forDNA to recover from heat shock exposure to the EMF emitted by cellphones shows that the paramagnetic material (such as in the form of theparamagnetic disk 1102) counteracts the harmful effects of the EMFexposure to human DNA, and allows the DNA to recover from the heatshock.

The natural coherent fields from the Aulterra rock crystals (e.g., theparamagnetic material, Aulterra Rock, Aulterra Powder, and/or AulterraNeutralizer) harmonize the incoherent EMF from a cell phone and retunethem to coherent and natural frequencies that do not cause adversereactions to living tissue. The human body encounters naturallyoccurring electromagnetic fields, such as from the Earth itself.However, the naturally occurring electromagnetic fields appear ascoherent, smooth wave patterns, whereas man-made electromagneticfrequencies are fuzzy or incoherent. When the paramagnetic material isapplied to a cell phone 1200 or similar device 1206, such as the exampleparamagnetic disk 1102, the emitted EMF is evened out from incoherent tocoherent wave patterns.

FIG. 13 depicts example procedure(s) 1300 of electromagnetic radiationtransformation for powered devices, and describes techniques that may beimplemented utilizing any environment and/or system described herein.The procedure is shown as a set of blocks and described in an order thatis not intended to be construed as a limitation. Any number of thedescribed blocks can be combined in any order to implement theprocedure, or an alternate procedure. In this example, reference is madeto the paramagnetic material implementation shown in FIG. 11 and thecellular phone device shown in FIG. 12.

Procedure 1300 illustrates an example implementation in whichparamagnetic material is located or otherwise disposed on, in, or abouta device to counteract electromagnetic radiation emitted by the device.Paramagnetic material can be combined with a base material that supportsthe paramagnetic material (block 1302). For example, the paramagneticmaterial 1104 can be combined with a base material 1112 that supportsthe paramagnetic material 1104 to form the paramagnetic material layers1110(1-N). The base material 1112 can be an ink-based material or anyother base-type material such as silica, silicon, and/or a caulking typematerial.

The paramagnetic material is bonded with an adhesive to adhere theparamagnetic material to a device that emits electromagnetic radiation(block 1304). For example, the bonding agent 1112 bonds the layers ofparamagnetic material 11 10(1-N) between the outer layer 1106 and anadhesive layer 1114. Electromagnetic radiation emitted by a source in adevice is detected (block 1306). For example, any type of device 1206,such as cell phone 1200, can include a power source 1208, an antennaassembly 1210, or any other type of electromagnetic radiation source1212.

The intensity of cell phone radiation can be measured using a specialtype of magnetometer to measure the overall intensity of cell phoneradiation across all frequencies (or large portions of the entirespectrum). Cell phone electromagnetic radiation can be measured byplacing an antenna, tuned to the frequencies emitted by a cell phone,next to the cell phone that is receiving an active transmission and/ortransmitting.

Paramagnetic material is located on (or in) the device in a quantitysufficient to counteract electromagnetic radiation emitted by the device(block 1308). For example, paramagnetic disk 1102 is positioned orlocated in cellular phone 1200. The electromagnetic radiation (emittedby the device) is transformed with the paramagnetic material to alter anintensity of the electromagnetic radiation (block 1310).

In various implementations, the paramagnetic material emits anelectromagnetic field to transform the electromagnetic radiation, theelectromagnetic radiation is transformed to effectuate a desiredfrequency range of the electromagnetic radiation, to alter an intensityor effectuate a decrease in the intensity of one or more frequencies ofthe electromagnetic radiation, to effectuate a paramagnetic frequencytransformation, and/or to effectuate a diamagnetic frequencytransformation. Harmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation arethen counteracted (block 1312).

Therapeutic Techniques with Paramagnetic Material

As described in the above studies, paramagnetic material may have avariety of therapeutic properties through a variety of differenttechniques. For example, macroscopic quantum coherence involves theassertion that the energy radiating from paramagnetic material may behighly coherent, e.g., laser-like. This coherence may be used tocounteract electromagnetic fields, both internal to a person as well asfrom external sources. For instance, the coherent energy of theparamagnetic material may be used to influence coherence of otherelectromagnetic fields. Additionally, the paramagnetic material may alsohave intrinsic quantum properties, like other complex lattice structureswhich also exhibit quantum properties.

In another example, a “bio-protective effect” may reduce the intensityof offending electromagnetic radiation. At least two differentmechanisms were described for this technique, a biochemical defenseresponse and a physical alteration of encountered electromagneticradiation, although other mechanisms are also contemplated. In a furtherexample, magneto resistance responses (e.g., Meissner effects) areinduced when the paramagnetic material is in the presence of magneticfields. Thus, paramagnetic shielding (in addition to ferromagneticshielding) is a likely explanation for the ability of the paramagneticmaterial to reverse effects of electromagnetic fields, such as on DNArenaturation.

Yet another example involves emission by the paramagnetic material of anelectromagnetic field that counteracts electromagnetic fieldsencountered within that field. This observation was offered as afeasible mechanism to explain how the paramagnetic material 102 (shownin FIG. 1) may cancel detrimental effects of electromagnetic radiation,since it is known that adding coherent information to a classical EMFmodifies its ability to influence biological systems. For example, theparamagnetic material may both generate magnetic fields (due to thepresence of unpaired electrons) and absorb magnetic fields (a propertycalled magnetic susceptibility). Thus, it is likely that theparamagnetic material also generates a classical EMF which can couple toand counteract another electromagnetic field, such as to neutralizeharmful effects to the “other” electromagnetic field. Electromagneticfield emission by the paramagnetic material may also be used to explainthe effect of the paramagnetic material to counteract detrimentaleffects of heavy metals on biological specimens, e.g., DNA. Regardlessof the particular mechanism employed, the paramagnetic material may thusprovide a wide variety of therapeutic benefits.

To realize these therapeutic benefits, a wide variety of devices may beconfigured to include paramagnetic material in a quantity sufficient torealize a therapeutic benefit. FIG. 14 illustrates examples 1400 of theparamagnetic material 1402 which may be incorporated for therapeutictechniques within a wide range of items that are carried or worn by aperson. For example, jewelry worn by a person can include such items asa ring 1404, a bracelet 1406, a necklace 1408, earrings 1410, eyeglasses, and so on.

The paramagnetic material may be also configured within a device that isto be positioned near a person, such as a pillow, in a shape of a creditcard 1412 to be placed within a user's wallet, in a handle 1414 of abrief case or purse, and so forth. In such a configuration, it may bedesirable to increase the quantity and/or potency of the paramagneticmaterial over that of paramagnetic material that is placed in contactwith a person, such as in the jewelry example above. Thus, theparamagnetic material when so positioned near and/or on a user mayprovide therapeutic benefits, such as those described in the previousstudies.

Although therapeutic uses with a person (i.e., a human being) have beendescribed, the therapeutic uses may be one or a combination of providinga desired effect, having the power to improve or heal, and as beingbeneficial and/or restorative to an entity, such as an entity asdescribed in relation to FIG. 1. For example, similar therapeuticbenefits are expected with other biological organisms, such as householdpets (e.g., dogs, cats, and so on). Therefore, use of a paramagneticmaterial in a sufficient quantity may also be used to protect otherbiological organisms from electromagnetic radiation, heavy metaltoxicity, and so on.

In another example, therapeutic benefits may be realized by perishableproducts, such as fruit, wine, beer, vegetables, and so on. Forinstance, a label 1416, 1418 having a therapeutically effective amountof paramagnetic material has been shown to preserve wine for a longerperiod of time, such as to protect against oxidation and preservedelicate flavors of the wine thereby increasing a shelf life of thewine. A variety of other instances are also contemplated.

FIGS. 15 and 16 depict example procedure(s) 1500 and 1600 of therapeutictechniques with paramagnetic material, and describe techniques that maybe implemented utilizing any environment and/or system described herein.The procedures are shown as a set of blocks and described in an orderthat is not intended to be construed as a limitation. Any number of thedescribed blocks can be combined in any order to implement theprocedure, or an alternate procedure. In these examples, reference ismade to the examples of paramagnetic material implemented fortherapeutic techniques as shown in FIG. 14.

Procedure 1500 illustrates an example implementation in which a deviceis implemented that includes paramagnetic material in a quantitysufficient to derive a beneficial therapeutic result. A device isimplemented that includes paramagnetic material in a quantity sufficientto effectuate a therapeutic result by electromagnetic frequencytransformation (block 1502). For example, the paramagnetic material maybe incorporated within a piece of jewelry, within a label, as a part ofa coating, as a powder within a pillow, and so on. Further, the quantitysufficient may be chosen based on proximity to the entity to beprotected, size of the entity (e.g., vegetable versus person), and soon. A benefit is then derived from the therapeutic result (block 1504).As previously described, a variety of benefits may be realized, fromimproved shelf life of wine to health benefits derived from coherence inelectromagnetic fields and protection against heavy metal toxicity.

FIG. 16 depicts a procedure 1600 in an exemplary implementation in whicha device is implemented having a paramagnetic material to transformelectromagnetic radiation to effectuate a therapeutic result. A deviceis implemented that includes paramagnetic material in a quantitysufficient to counteract electromagnetic radiation (block 1602). Thisquantity may be determined in a variety of ways. For example, DNAstudies previously described showed potential benefits of particularquantities of paramagnetic material in counteracting electromagneticradiation. The counteracting may also be performed in a variety of ways,such as by altering a waveform of electromagnetic radiation (e.g.,coherence), reducing an intensity of electromagnetic radiation atcertain frequencies, and so on.

The electromagnetic radiation may then be transformed to effectuate atherapeutic result (block 1604). As previously described, coherence ofelectromagnetic radiation, reduction in intensity of particularelectromagnetic frequencies, and so on may provide a wide range oftherapeutic benefits. For instance, heavy metal toxicity may be reducedor eliminated, wine and other perishable items may be given a longershelf life, DNA may be protected from radiation, and so forth.

Cosmetic Composition with Paramagnetic Material

As previously described, a variety of therapeutic advantages may berealized through the use of the paramagnetic material. Further, theseadvantages may be implemented using a variety of techniques, such asjewelry and so on as described in the preceding section. In thefollowing embodiments, these advantages are realized throughconfiguration as a cosmetic composition.

FIG. 17 illustrates example implementations 1700 of a cosmeticcomposition 1702 having a paramagnetic material 1704. The cosmeticcomposition 1702 includes a cosmetically acceptable medium 1706, such asany medium that is suitable to be applied to the body of a user and mayinclude a variety of lotions, gells, waxes, creams, sprays, powders,masques, shampoos, conditioners, and so on. For example, thecosmetically acceptable medium 1706 may function as a base for alipstick 1708, eye shadow, blush 1710 (with an applicator 1712 andcontainer 1714 as illustrated), eye liner, and so on. Thus, any one ormore of the previously described therapeutic techniques may be realizedon the part of a user. Further, these effects may be tailored as desiredby a manufacturer.

FIGS. 18 and 19 depict example procedure(s) 1800 and 1900 of techniquesfor cosmetic composition with paramagnetic material, and describetechniques that may be implemented utilizing any environment and/orsystem described herein. The procedure is shown as a set of blocks anddescribed in an order that is not intended to be construed as alimitation. Any number of the described blocks can be combined in anyorder to implement the procedure, or an alternate procedure. In thisexample, reference is made to the examples of paramagnetic materialimplemented for cosmetic applications as shown in FIG. 17.

Procedure 1800 illustrates an example implementation in which a cosmeticis manufactured to have a desired electromagnetic transformation effect.A medium is obtained that is suitable for application on human skin(block 1802). As previously described, for instance, the medium may beconfigured for application on a human body, such as on the lips, cheek,eyelids, and so on.

A desired transformation effect of electromagnetic radiation isdetermined (block 1804). For example, a determination may be made toreduce the effect of external electromagnetic radiation by a certainpercentage, e.g., 35 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent, and so on. Avariety of other examples are also contemplated, such as to promotecoherence of electromagnetic radiation that originates internal to awearer of the cosmetic, promote a resonance effect to protect DNA, andso forth.

A paramagnetic material is dispersed in the medium in a quantitysufficient to effectuate the desired transformation effect of theelectromagnetic radiation (block 1806). Continuing with the previousexample, the manufacturer may determine that it is desirable to blockapproximately 35 percent of electromagnetic radiation encountered by thecosmetic composition, such as that illustrated in the previous DNAstudies. Accordingly, the manufacturer may include a quantity sufficientto effectuate this effect in the cosmetically-acceptable medium. Avariety of other examples are also contemplated. Therefore, a wearer ofthe cosmetic composition may realize the advantages of the paramagneticmaterial, an example of which is further described in the followingexemplary procedure.

Procedure 1900 illustrates an example implementation in which a cosmeticcomposition is applied to human skin. A cosmetic composition comprisinga cosmetically acceptable medium having a paramagnetic material isapplied on human skin (block 1902). The cosmetic composition, forinstance, may be configured as a blush, lotion, lipstick and so on thatincludes a paramagnetic material, such as the “Aulterra Rock” or“Aulterra Powder” as previously described.

A waveform of electromagnetic radiation exposed to the human skin isaltered using the paramagnetic material of the cosmetic composition(block 1904). The paramagnetic material, for instance, may employ atechnique that has been referred to as macroscopic quantum coherence.This mechanism includes an assertion that the energy radiating fromparamagnetic material may be highly coherent, e.g., laser-like, whichmay be activated during manufacture of the paramagnetic material 1704 tomake the intrinsic energy of the paramagnetic material coherent. Theparamagnetic material may also have intrinsic quantum properties, likeother complex lattice structures which also exhibit quantum properties.This coherence may operate to apply coherence to other incoherentelectromagnetic radiation encountered by the cosmetic composition,thereby making available the previously described therapeutic benefits.A variety of other examples are also contemplated.

Electromagnetic Radiation Transformation for Power Transports

Embodiments of electromagnetic radiation transformation for powertransports can include devices, systems, and/or procedures that mayutilize paramagnetic and/or diamagnetic techniques to transformelectromagnetic frequencies (e.g., radio frequencies), electromagneticinterference or fields, and/or electro-pollution all which may becommonly referred to as electromagnetic radiation, “EMF”, or “EMFradiation”.

In various embodiments, a power conducting system can include a powertransport such as a conduit, power line, electrical cord, and the likethat conducts power which is a source of electromagnetic radiation. Thepower conducting system can also include a paramagnetic material in aquantity sufficient to counteract the electromagnetic radiation emittedby the source. In an embodiment, the power transport can be covered by acoating and/or an insulation cover that includes the paramagneticmaterial. To counteract harmful effects of the electromagneticradiation, the paramagnetic material can transform the electromagneticradiation, such as to effectuate a frequency transformation and/or toalter an intensity or waveform of the electromagnetic radiation.

FIG. 20 illustrates examples 2000 of paramagnetic material which can beimplemented for the transformation of electromagnetic radiation emittedfrom a power conducting system, such as a power line system 2002, asurge protector 2004, and the like. A power transport, such as a powerline 2006, a wire or system of wires 2008 (e.g., a power cord, highvoltage conductor, power line, and the like), or a conduit 2010 thatconducts power 2112 which is a source of electromagnetic radiation.

Any of the power transports (e.g., power line 2006, power cord 2008, orconduit 2010) can have a coating or insulation cover 2014 that includesparamagnetic material in a quantity sufficient to counteract theelectromagnetic radiation emitted by the source. A coating or cover 2014can include a bonding agent that bonds the paramagnetic material withthe coating or insulation cover for application on, over, and/or arounda power transport.

In various embodiments, the paramagnetic material implemented in acoating or insulation cover can transform the electromagnetic radiationto effectuate a desired frequency range of the electromagneticradiation. The paramagnetic material may also transform theelectromagnetic radiation to decrease an intensity of one or morefrequencies of the electromagnetic radiation. The paramagnetic materialmay also counteract the electromagnetic radiation to effectuate aparamagnetic frequency transformation and/or a diamagnetic frequencytransformation. Alternatively, and/or in addition, the paramagneticmaterial can also be implemented to emit an electromagnetic field tocounteract the harmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation.

FIG. 21 depicts example procedure(s) 2100 of electromagnetic radiationtransformation for power transports, and describes techniques that maybe implemented utilizing any environment and/or system described herein.The procedure is shown as a set of blocks and described in an order thatis not intended to be construed as a limitation. Any number of thedescribed blocks can be combined in any order to implement theprocedure, or an alternate procedure. In this example, reference is madeto the paramagnetic material implementations shown in FIG. 20.

Procedure 2100 illustrates an example implementation in whichparamagnetic material is implemented to counteract electromagneticradiation emitted from a power transport that conducts power which is asource of the electromagnetic radiation. Power is conducted via a powerconductor where the power is a source of electromagnetic radiation(block 2102). The electromagnetic radiation is transformed withparamagnetic material to alter an intensity of the electromagneticradiation (block 2104).

In various implementations, the paramagnetic material emits anelectromagnetic field to transform the electromagnetic radiation (block2106), the electromagnetic radiation is transformed to effectuate adesired frequency range of the electromagnetic radiation, to alter anintensity or effectuate a decrease in the intensity of one or morefrequencies of the electromagnetic radiation, to effectuate aparamagnetic frequency transformation, and/or to effectuate adiamagnetic frequency transformation. Harmful effects of theelectromagnetic radiation are then counteracted with the paramagneticmaterial (block 2108).

Although embodiments of electromagnetic radiation transformation havebeen described in language specific to features and/or methods, it is tobe understood that the subject of the appended claims is not necessarilylimited to the specific features or methods described. Rather, thespecific features and methods are disclosed as example implementationsof electromagnetic radiation transformation.

1. A power conducting system, comprising: a power transport configuredto conduct power that is a source of electromagnetic radiation; and aparamagnetic material in a quantity sufficient to counteract theelectromagnetic radiation emitted by the source.
 2. A power conductingsystem as recited in claim 1, wherein the power transport is a conduitconfigured to conduct the power.
 3. A power conducting system as recitedin claim 1, wherein the power transport is a power line configured toconduct the power.
 4. A power conducting system as recited in claim 1,wherein the power transport is at least one of a wire or a wire systemconfigured to conduct the power.
 5. A power conducting system as recitedin claim 1, further comprising an insulation cover configured to coverthe power transport, the insulation cover including the paramagneticmaterial.
 6. A power conducting system as recited in claim 5, furthercomprising a bonding agent configured to bond the paramagnetic materialwith the insulation cover.
 7. A power conducting system as recited inclaim 1, further comprising a coating configured to cover the powertransport, the coating including the paramagnetic material.
 8. A powerconducting system as recited in claim 1, wherein the paramagneticmaterial counteracts harmful effects of the electromagnetic radiation.9. A power conducting system as recited in claim 1, wherein theparamagnetic material counteracts the electromagnetic radiation byemitting an electromagnetic field.
 10. A power conducting system asrecited in claim 1, wherein the paramagnetic material transforms theelectromagnetic radiation to counteract the electromagnetic radiation.11. A power conducting system as recited in claim 10, wherein theparamagnetic material transforms the electromagnetic radiation toeffectuate a desired frequency range of the electromagnetic radiation.12. A power conducting system as recited in claim 10, wherein theparamagnetic material transforms the electromagnetic radiation todecrease an intensity of one or more frequencies of the electromagneticradiation.
 13. A power conducting system as recited in claim 1, whereinthe paramagnetic material counteracts the electromagnetic radiation toeffectuate a paramagnetic frequency transformation.
 14. A powerconducting system as recited in claim 1, wherein the paramagneticmaterial counteracts the electromagnetic radiation to effectuate adiamagnetic frequency transformation.
 15. A system, comprising: a powerconductor configured to conduct power that is a source ofelectromagnetic radiation; and a paramagnetic material configured totransform the electromagnetic radiation.
 16. A system as recited inclaim 15, wherein the paramagnetic material transforms theelectromagnetic radiation to counteract the electromagnetic radiation.17. A system as recited in claim 15, wherein the paramagnetic materialtransforms the electromagnetic radiation to effectuate a desiredfrequency range of the electromagnetic radiation.
 18. A system asrecited in claim 15, wherein the paramagnetic material transforms theelectromagnetic radiation to decrease an intensity of one or morefrequencies of the electromagnetic radiation.
 19. A system as recited inclaim 15, wherein the paramagnetic material transforms theelectromagnetic radiation to effectuate a paramagnetic frequencytransformation.
 20. A system as recited in claim 15, wherein theparamagnetic material transforms the electromagnetic radiation toeffectuate a diamagnetic frequency transformation.
 21. A system asrecited in claim 15, wherein the power conductor is a conduit configuredto conduct the power.
 22. A system as recited in claim 15, wherein thepower conductor is a power line configured to conduct the power.
 23. Asystem as recited in claim 15, further comprising a cover configured toinsulate the power conductor, the cover including the paramagneticmaterial.
 24. A method, comprising: conducting power via a powerconductor where the power is a source of electromagnetic radiation; andtransforming the electromagnetic radiation with paramagnetic material toalter an intensity of the electromagnetic radiation.
 25. A method asrecited in claim 24, wherein transforming the electromagnetic radiationwith the paramagnetic material alters the intensity of one or morefrequencies of the electromagnetic radiation.
 26. A method as recited inclaim 24, further comprising counteracting harmful effects of theelectromagnetic radiation with the paramagnetic material.
 27. A methodas recited in claim 24, further comprising emitting an electromagneticfield with the paramagnetic material to transform the electromagneticradiation.
 28. A method as recited in claim 24, further comprisingcombining the paramagnetic material with a cover that insulates thepower conductor.
 29. A method as recited in claim 24, further comprisingcombining the paramagnetic material with a coating that covers the powerconductor.
 30. A method as recited in claim 24, wherein theelectromagnetic radiation is transformed to effectuate a desiredfrequency range of the electromagnetic radiation.
 31. A method asrecited in claim 24, wherein transforming the electromagnetic radiationwith the paramagnetic material decreases the intensity of one or morefrequencies of the electromagnetic radiation.
 32. A method as recited inclaim 24, wherein the electromagnetic radiation is transformed toeffectuate a paramagnetic frequency transformation.
 33. A method asrecited in claim 24, wherein the electromagnetic radiation istransformed to effectuate a diamagnetic frequency transformation.
 34. Amethod as recited in claim 24, wherein the power is conducted via thepower conductor that includes at least one of a conduit, a power line,or a wire system.